When treatment no longer reaches its goal
Some of the people I am called for do not come home. This stands here because you should read it beforehand, and not only when it happens.
When the goal changes
An intensive care measure is permissible when two things apply: it is medically indicated, and it corresponds to the patient’s will. If one of the two falls away, the goal of treatment changes.
That is not an end of treatment. It is a different treatment. The goal is then no longer to extend life, but to take away symptoms.
Responsibility for that decision lies with the treating doctor, in the sense of the patient. It does not lie with you. You are asked what he would have wanted.
- INDICATION AND THE PATIENT’S WILL — POSITION PAPER OF THE ETHICS SECTION OF THE DIVI, DIE ANAESTHESIOLOGIE 2013, DOI 10.1007/S00101-012-2126-X
- PRINCIPLES OF THE GERMAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION ON MEDICAL CARE AT THE END OF LIFE, DTSCH ARZTEBL 2011;108(7):A 346
- SECTION 1827 · SECTIONS 1814 ET SEQ. · SECTION 1358 GERMAN CIVIL CODE
What I do in this phase
- I examine what the current treatment is meant to achieve and whether it can achieve it.
- I establish whether there is an advance directive, a health care proxy or a guardianship, and whether it fits the situation. You take part in that.
- Where it fits, I propose a time-limited trial of therapy: a defined goal, a defined period, defined criteria and a defined date on which the decision is taken again.
- I tell you that a clinical ethics consultation can be requested by you as well, not only by the treating team.
- I write down what was discussed and give it to you.
- I speak with the treating team, not against it.
- TIME-LIMITED TRIAL OF THERAPY. RECOMMENDATION OF THE ETHICS SECTIONS OF THE DIVI AND THE DGIIN, MED KLIN INTENSIVMED NOTFMED 2024;119:291–295, DOI 10.1007/S00063-024-01112-4
When transport no longer makes sense
There is a point beyond which a flight gives the patient nothing and burdens him. And there is another point at which a flight remains right although he will probably not survive it.
Those are two different questions. I answer them separately, and I answer them beforehand.
My fee does not depend on whether a flight takes place.
If there is a flight, I record in writing beforehand what applies should he die on the way: who decides then, where the aircraft lands, who issues the papers.
When he dies
Then my medical task ends, but not on the same day.
- I explain what the papers say: the death certificate, the civil death record, the laissez-passer for a corpse. I tell you whether they are complete.
- I tell you which decision depends on a deadline. In some countries the choice between burial on site and repatriation falls within hours, not days.
- I tell you who does the rest. The German mission abroad issues papers and certifies them. It organises nothing and it pays nothing.
- I do not organise repatriation, I do not recommend an undertaker, and I take money from none of them.
After four to six weeks I offer you a conversation. In order to go through the course again, because by then the questions have changed. You do not have to accept.
What this is not
- This is not bereavement support. I am not trained for that.
- This is not palliative care. That is provided by whoever is on site.
- This is not an assessment of the doctors who treated him.
- And I tell you nothing I cannot substantiate.
Sources
- SECTION 630F(3) GERMAN CIVIL CODE — RECORDS, TEN-YEAR RETENTION
- GERMAN CONSULAR ACT, SECTIONS 1 AND 9 — TASKS OF THE MISSION ABROAD
- FUNERAL LAWS OF THE LÄNDER · BERLIN AGREEMENT ON THE TRANSFER OF CORPSES 1937
- PRINCIPLES OF THE GERMAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION ON MEDICAL CARE AT THE END OF LIFE, DTSCH ARZTEBL 2011;108(7):A 346
CHECKED 2026-08-07